Why Do Policy - Motivated Justices Conform to Unfavorable Precedents ? the Role of Social - Legal Backgrounds and Precedential Characteristics
نویسنده
چکیده
Why do policy-motivated justices conform to unfavorable precedents? This article suggests that two theories, social-legal backgrounds and precedential characteristics, help explain why justices support unfavorable precedents. To test the explanatory power of these theories, the article uses data from the 1953-94 terms that ascertains whether justices cast precedential votes. The results, after testing multiple indictors of each theory, suggest that precedential voting is more likely when cases have older landmark precedents, cases have positive precedent vitality, and justices have a strong social-legal background. However, the likelihood of precedential voting decreases when justices have an elite legal pedigree and when justices confront a well-cited landmark precedent. This implies that future tests of legal decision making need to sort out the ambivalent effects of precedent and social-legal backgrounds.
منابع مشابه
Tom Clark and Benjamin Lauderdale , “ Locating Supreme Court Opinions in Doctrine Space ”
Clark and Lauderdale develop a novel approach for orienting Supreme Court opinions in unidimensional policy space. They argue that the most important portion of a Court’s opinion is not its judgment in favor of one party or another, but its reasoning, for it is this reasoning that becomes binding law and shapes the path of American legal development. The authors thus measure the policy orientat...
متن کاملGlobal Health Politics: Neither Solidarity nor Policy; Comment on “Globalization and the Diffusion of Ideas: Why We Should Acknowledge the Roots of Mainstream Ideas in Global Health”
The global health agenda has been dominating the current global health policy debate. Furthermore, it has compelled countries to embrace strategies for tackling health inequalities in a wide range of public health areas. The article by Robert and colleagues highlights that although globalization has increased opportunities to share and spread ideas, there is still great asymmetry of power accor...
متن کاملSchooling the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Justices' uniform professional backgrounds have drawn increasing criticism. Yet it is unclear how diverse professional training would affect the Court's decisions. This Article offers the first empirical analysis of how Justices with diverse professional training vote: It examines a unique period when Justices with formal legal education sat with Justices who entered the professio...
متن کامل“Calling People to do Good Deeds” and “Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong” [Amr Bil Ma'ruf and Nahi 'Anil Munkar] and its Effect on Institutionalization in the Legal System of Islamic Republic of Iran
The holy Quran has put “calling people to do good deeds” [or calling people to an act of benevolence] besides and prior to “commanding rightand forbidding wrong”, [or commanding beneficence and forbidding maleficence]. However in many interpretive and jurisprudential books, no sufficient effort has been made to elaborate the difference features between these two and their results, whose manife...
متن کاملایدز و مکانیسمهای پایش و حمایت از حقوق بشر
Guidelines of world health organization for legal documents related to AIDS included many statutes that ratify hasty by those statesmen that eager to response strongly against AIDS. One of the purposes of this research is to help the statesman and legislators to codify statues that conform to the public health and human rights principle. It must be considered that Different and innovative react...
متن کامل